The freight train ahead may have been waiting at a red signal for another train to clear such as where two sets of tracks cross one another.
coolcatevan9 March 2nd, 2010
amtrak+ collision= SLAMTRAK
MotelCambodia March 2nd, 2010
Pay day for the passengers
CPRHudson2816 March 2nd, 2010
who parks freight cars on a main line anyways?
donjuandonjuan March 2nd, 2010
that engineer is a Moron
Dunnkw March 2nd, 2010
Damn, now look who’s not paying attention. GCOR 6.28. Good thing i’m not runnin right now we’d have cars all over the place.
Dunnkw March 2nd, 2010
Excuse me 6.27
Dunnkw March 2nd, 2010
When required to move at restricted speed trains must travel at a speed which allows them to stop within half the range of vision. Amtrak is not one to travel at restricted speed often. When in yard limits all movements must be made at restricted speed, if you are on a main track. If you’re in the yard movement is governed by GCOR 6.26 (movement on other than main track which is almost word for word restricted speed. It looks like amtrak was not following the rules.
RDG484 March 2nd, 2010
WOW!! Just look at how that rear car rose up at the impact.
targetpractice13 March 2nd, 2010
dont see that everyday
WNxRadeon March 2nd, 2010
WTF??? lol
dogyloli March 2nd, 2010
DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY Cuz IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS reaLLY WORKS
OmahaTom March 2nd, 2010
Ouch.
robertgift March 2nd, 2010
John, can’t they dedicate a bypass track for passenger trains?
I thought they did that to avoid ruining schedules and to be safer.
Now I know passenger trains must adhere to same rules in yards and are granted no higher speeds. Thanks.
robertgift March 2nd, 2010
Should both the engineer and dispatcher be blamed for not making it clear that a train was on the same track?
I would have thought they would not switch Amtrak onto a track where Amtrak would have to come to a halt behind a stopped train, especially when so close to the station.
Don’t they keep a track open just for the many passenger trains? (Too bad they don’t have a dedicated track.)
Thanks, John.
robertgift March 2nd, 2010
Since when does a passenger train follwo restricted speed in a yard.
Doen’t a passenger train get expedited?
Otherwise it takes much longer to get to the station.
robertgift March 2nd, 2010
His vision was restricted by the curve.
Was he to slow even further before entering the curve?
Had this been on a straight section, he would have been able to slow and stop, correct?
What is your summation of any later information?
Thank you.
Northwest of Denver, two trains collided head-on under U.S. 36. Fatality. Had either one been later or earlier, the would have seen each other.
This was one place they could not.
itsjustmattie March 2nd, 2010
The engineer confused the signal with one from a different railroad territory that he runs on. The dispatcher does not have to tell him that there is a train in the block. The engineer must run on signal indication. The indication he had was to proceed at restricted speed, being able to stop in 1/2 the distance of vision.
RCdash9 March 2nd, 2010
They say that Amtrak’s ridership is going up. But the governmental support is all bullshit.
JSimp140 March 2nd, 2010
this probably won’t help the car shortage they have.
cuttingwoodnow March 2nd, 2010
Quick brake hurt the passengers.
jordanschepis March 2nd, 2010
d’oh
jpboonexxvii March 2nd, 2010
This was not a “communication breakdown”. It was the engineer’s responsibility to follow protocol, as displayed by the signal’s indication. The dispatcher’s warning that there is another train ahead does not supercede the FRA’s mandate that the engineer will proceed into the block prepared to stop (within 1/2 the distance of sight). In this case, the engineer simply failed to operate his train at a safe speed that allowed him to stop short of the train ahead.
Danapeople March 2nd, 2010
OPPS!!! whos fault is it: UP of amtrak, i would think both. remember, kids dont try this at home! Not!
airplanebuilderman
March 2nd, 2010
slamtrak that’s a good one
hudson501
March 2nd, 2010
The freight train ahead may have been waiting at a red signal for another train to clear such as where two sets of tracks cross one another.
coolcatevan9
March 2nd, 2010
amtrak+ collision= SLAMTRAK
MotelCambodia
March 2nd, 2010
Pay day for the passengers
CPRHudson2816
March 2nd, 2010
who parks freight cars on a main line anyways?
donjuandonjuan
March 2nd, 2010
that engineer is a Moron
Dunnkw
March 2nd, 2010
Damn, now look who’s not paying attention. GCOR 6.28. Good thing i’m not runnin right now we’d have cars all over the place.
Dunnkw
March 2nd, 2010
Excuse me 6.27
Dunnkw
March 2nd, 2010
When required to move at restricted speed trains must travel at a speed which allows them to stop within half the range of vision. Amtrak is not one to travel at restricted speed often. When in yard limits all movements must be made at restricted speed, if you are on a main track. If you’re in the yard movement is governed by GCOR 6.26 (movement on other than main track which is almost word for word restricted speed. It looks like amtrak was not following the rules.
RDG484
March 2nd, 2010
WOW!! Just look at how that rear car rose up at the impact.
targetpractice13
March 2nd, 2010
dont see that everyday
WNxRadeon
March 2nd, 2010
WTF??? lol
dogyloli
March 2nd, 2010
DONT READ THIS Cause It Really Works. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DONT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW UV STARTED READIN DIS DUNT STOP THIS IS SO SCARY. SEND THIS OVER TO 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR CRUSHES NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY Cuz IT ACTUALLY WORKS THIS reaLLY WORKS
OmahaTom
March 2nd, 2010
Ouch.
robertgift
March 2nd, 2010
John, can’t they dedicate a bypass track for passenger trains?
I thought they did that to avoid ruining schedules and to be safer.
Now I know passenger trains must adhere to same rules in yards and are granted no higher speeds. Thanks.
robertgift
March 2nd, 2010
Should both the engineer and dispatcher be blamed for not making it clear that a train was on the same track?
I would have thought they would not switch Amtrak onto a track where Amtrak would have to come to a halt behind a stopped train, especially when so close to the station.
Don’t they keep a track open just for the many passenger trains? (Too bad they don’t have a dedicated track.)
Thanks, John.
robertgift
March 2nd, 2010
Since when does a passenger train follwo restricted speed in a yard.
Doen’t a passenger train get expedited?
Otherwise it takes much longer to get to the station.
robertgift
March 2nd, 2010
His vision was restricted by the curve.
Was he to slow even further before entering the curve?
Had this been on a straight section, he would have been able to slow and stop, correct?
What is your summation of any later information?
Thank you.
Northwest of Denver, two trains collided head-on under U.S. 36. Fatality. Had either one been later or earlier, the would have seen each other.
This was one place they could not.
itsjustmattie
March 2nd, 2010
The engineer confused the signal with one from a different railroad territory that he runs on. The dispatcher does not have to tell him that there is a train in the block. The engineer must run on signal indication. The indication he had was to proceed at restricted speed, being able to stop in 1/2 the distance of vision.
RCdash9
March 2nd, 2010
They say that Amtrak’s ridership is going up. But the governmental support is all bullshit.
JSimp140
March 2nd, 2010
this probably won’t help the car shortage they have.
cuttingwoodnow
March 2nd, 2010
Quick brake hurt the passengers.
jordanschepis
March 2nd, 2010
d’oh
jpboonexxvii
March 2nd, 2010
This was not a “communication breakdown”. It was the engineer’s responsibility to follow protocol, as displayed by the signal’s indication. The dispatcher’s warning that there is another train ahead does not supercede the FRA’s mandate that the engineer will proceed into the block prepared to stop (within 1/2 the distance of sight). In this case, the engineer simply failed to operate his train at a safe speed that allowed him to stop short of the train ahead.
Danapeople
March 2nd, 2010
OPPS!!! whos fault is it: UP of amtrak, i would think both. remember, kids dont try this at home! Not!